All use cases
Scoring and evaluation at scale

One standard, applied to everything that arrives

The standard usually exists already, written down as a rubric, a checklist or a shared idea of what a good one looks like. What is missing is the hours to apply it past a sample, and a sample works out as a spot check that people learn to survive.

How it runs today

A reviewer takes a handful of cases a month, reads them properly, and writes up what they found. It is good work and it is honest about being partial. Two reviewers score the same case differently, one reviewer scores differently at nine in the morning than at five, and nobody finds out which because there is no second read.

What the system does
  1. 01We encode your standard as it is written, including the parts that are only in a reviewer's head, which is usually where the work of this project actually is.
  2. 02It scores everything that arrives against that standard, including the cases a sample would miss.
  3. 03Every judgement carries the passage, the moment or the value it is based on.
  4. 04We calibrate against cases your own reviewers have scored, so you can see where the system agrees with them and where it does not before it is trusted.
  5. 05The standard stays editable, because a rubric that cannot be changed is a rubric people work around.
What you get
  • A score for every case, on the same criteria, with the evidence behind each one
  • The spread across everything rather than an average of the sample
  • Outliers and drift visible: who is moving, what is slipping, where the standard is being read differently
  • Any single result open to being overturned by a reviewer who disagrees
Where it stops

It does not decide consequences. It produces a score and the evidence for it; whether that means a conversation, a re-review or nothing at all is a decision a person makes, and where the result affects somebody that rule is not negotiable.

Where this shows up
  • Quality review on every case rather than the monthly sample
  • Supplier, application and submission scoring against your own criteria
  • Training and instructor evaluation on every session that runs

Tell us the decision you want to fix

One call, no deck. We will tell you whether this is something we can build for you, and if it is not, we will say that too.

EU AI Act compliantGDPR compliantOur cloud and models, yours, or on-premiseBuilt in Europe